Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cruisin Central"
Alanlastufka (talk | contribs) (→Review vs entry: edited for clarity) |
Dan10things (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:We have about four or five 'books' that I'm aware of on the site, however, all of those books tie back to zines, either the content of the book is about zines ([[Stolen Sharpie Revolution]]), or the author was once a zinester, or the author has made some other incredible contribution to zines. For instance, the [[Jeremy Robert Johnson]] page may look like it has little to do with zines, but he has written time and time again for [[Verbicide]] and did a reading for the [[Zinester Podcasts]] and tables at the [[Portland Zine Symposium]] every year... so, he, and his self-published books count, in my opinion. If the author of the book you've reviewed here has made comparable contributions to the zine world, by all means it stays (as an entry, not a review). But those are just my thoughts on it, and I removed the relevency tag when we started ZineWiki for a reason. [[User:Alanlastufka|Alan Fall of Autumn]] 19:13, 27 September 2006 (EDT) | :We have about four or five 'books' that I'm aware of on the site, however, all of those books tie back to zines, either the content of the book is about zines ([[Stolen Sharpie Revolution]]), or the author was once a zinester, or the author has made some other incredible contribution to zines. For instance, the [[Jeremy Robert Johnson]] page may look like it has little to do with zines, but he has written time and time again for [[Verbicide]] and did a reading for the [[Zinester Podcasts]] and tables at the [[Portland Zine Symposium]] every year... so, he, and his self-published books count, in my opinion. If the author of the book you've reviewed here has made comparable contributions to the zine world, by all means it stays (as an entry, not a review). But those are just my thoughts on it, and I removed the relevency tag when we started ZineWiki for a reason. [[User:Alanlastufka|Alan Fall of Autumn]] 19:13, 27 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::It seems like this one should be deleted then, I think the same is true with the Game Quest listing Tom mentioned, I just read it. There is a big potential for abuse here with book publishers and authors essentially trying to get free ads here for their books--books that have nothing to do with zines. I'd delete both, but I could not see a function to do so. I also think the authors should be notified first. [[User:Dan10things|dan10things]] 20:55, 28 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:55, 29 September 2006
I don't think ZineWiki is a place for reviews. At least, if we're going to do reviews, they shouldn't be mixed in with the regular articles, they shoul dbe offset like the Punk Planet articles are so that everyone knows they are seperate. Alan Fall of Autumn 04:06, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
I agree, this is a book review, it makes no sense to have it on a Wiki, much less a Wiki devoted to zines. It should probably just be deleted. dan10things 11:49, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
Review vs entry
I meant it to be just info on the book - and the book is surely just as indie as Game Quest for ex. Perhaps I can rewrite it. PS Dan is against anything I do so I take everything he says as just the general no to all. Musea 13:51, 27 September 2006 (EDT)
I'll add this - this novel fits every definition to make it eligible on zinewiki. This is a single person published book - and a great one. And the author is as indie as you can get. Musea 14:17, 27 September 2006 (EDT)
Tom, you are paranoid, I honestly didn't know you had written it. Alan commented first, I saw his comment in the "recent changes" page, read it, and agreed. I thought it was someone confused as to what ZineWiki was about and reviewing a book here, I figured any existing editor would know better.
While I totally support indie projects, not all of them fall within the scope of the ZineWiki. Similarly I don't think bands should be plugging their indie CDs here. Stuff like indie books, indie bands and their releases, indie crafts, indie art projects, etc. have nothing to do with zines. It seems to me the only books that we should be including are books about zines like the F5 Reader, The Book of Zines, etc. But that's just this one person's opinion, if you believe otherwise, by all means make the case for it. There are tons of "single person published books," should we open the door the thousands that are out there, I fear the focus of the ZineWiki on zines would get dilluted, if not lost. dan10things 14:30, 27 September 2006 (EDT)
- We have about four or five 'books' that I'm aware of on the site, however, all of those books tie back to zines, either the content of the book is about zines (Stolen Sharpie Revolution), or the author was once a zinester, or the author has made some other incredible contribution to zines. For instance, the Jeremy Robert Johnson page may look like it has little to do with zines, but he has written time and time again for Verbicide and did a reading for the Zinester Podcasts and tables at the Portland Zine Symposium every year... so, he, and his self-published books count, in my opinion. If the author of the book you've reviewed here has made comparable contributions to the zine world, by all means it stays (as an entry, not a review). But those are just my thoughts on it, and I removed the relevency tag when we started ZineWiki for a reason. Alan Fall of Autumn 19:13, 27 September 2006 (EDT)
- It seems like this one should be deleted then, I think the same is true with the Game Quest listing Tom mentioned, I just read it. There is a big potential for abuse here with book publishers and authors essentially trying to get free ads here for their books--books that have nothing to do with zines. I'd delete both, but I could not see a function to do so. I also think the authors should be notified first. dan10things 20:55, 28 September 2006 (EDT)
