Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cruisin Central"
(→Review vs entry: signed) |
(→Review vs entry: discussion) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
PS Dan is against anything I do so I take everything he says as just the | PS Dan is against anything I do so I take everything he says as just the | ||
general no to all. [[User:Musea|Musea]] 13:51, 27 September 2006 (EDT) | general no to all. [[User:Musea|Musea]] 13:51, 27 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll add this - this novel fits every definition to make it eligible on zinewiki. | ||
| + | This is a single person published book - and a great one. And the author | ||
| + | is as indie as you can get. [[User:Musea|Musea]] 14:17, 27 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 27 September 2006
I don't think ZineWiki is a place for reviews. At least, if we're going to do reviews, they shouldn't be mixed in with the regular articles, they shoul dbe offset like the Punk Planet articles are so that everyone knows they are seperate. Alan Fall of Autumn 04:06, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
I agree, this is a book review, it makes no sense to have it on a Wiki, much less a Wiki devoted to zines. It should probably just be deleted. dan10things 11:49, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
Review vs entry
I meant it to be just info on the book - and the book is surely just as indie as Game Quest for ex. Perhaps I can rewrite it. PS Dan is against anything I do so I take everything he says as just the general no to all. Musea 13:51, 27 September 2006 (EDT)
I'll add this - this novel fits every definition to make it eligible on zinewiki. This is a single person published book - and a great one. And the author is as indie as you can get. Musea 14:17, 27 September 2006 (EDT)
