Difference between revisions of "Talk:Poison Pen"
From ZineWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: I noticed that InvisibleFriend removed the reviews that had been included in this entry. I don't know, I was kind of thinking I liked having one or two reviews on there. It might be a good...) |
Dan10things (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I noticed that InvisibleFriend removed the reviews that had been included in this entry. I don't know, I was kind of thinking I liked having one or two reviews on there. It might be a good model for including info like abstracts or library holdings. Then again, it might be clutter. Anyone else have thoughts on this? [[User:Jerianne|Jerianne]] 13:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | I noticed that InvisibleFriend removed the reviews that had been included in this entry. I don't know, I was kind of thinking I liked having one or two reviews on there. It might be a good model for including info like abstracts or library holdings. Then again, it might be clutter. Anyone else have thoughts on this? [[User:Jerianne|Jerianne]] 13:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I'm not opposed to posting reviews as long as it doesn't make the article look like an ad. Maybe quoting a review in the description works better than listing a couple of full reviews. [[User:Dan10things|dan10things]] 00:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:21, 15 August 2009
I noticed that InvisibleFriend removed the reviews that had been included in this entry. I don't know, I was kind of thinking I liked having one or two reviews on there. It might be a good model for including info like abstracts or library holdings. Then again, it might be clutter. Anyone else have thoughts on this? Jerianne 13:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not opposed to posting reviews as long as it doesn't make the article look like an ad. Maybe quoting a review in the description works better than listing a couple of full reviews. dan10things 00:21, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
