Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cruisin Central"
From ZineWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchDan10things (talk | contribs) |
(Review vs entry) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I agree, this is a book review, it makes no sense to have it on a Wiki, much less a Wiki devoted to zines. It should probably just be deleted. [[User:Dan10things|dan10things]] 11:49, 26 September 2006 (EDT) | I agree, this is a book review, it makes no sense to have it on a Wiki, much less a Wiki devoted to zines. It should probably just be deleted. [[User:Dan10things|dan10things]] 11:49, 26 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Review vs entry == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I meant it to be just info on the book - and the book is surely just as indie | ||
+ | as Game Quest for ex. | ||
+ | Perhaps I can rewrite it. | ||
+ | PS Dan is against anything I do so I take everything he says as just the | ||
+ | general no to all. |
Revision as of 17:50, 27 September 2006
I don't think ZineWiki is a place for reviews. At least, if we're going to do reviews, they shouldn't be mixed in with the regular articles, they shoul dbe offset like the Punk Planet articles are so that everyone knows they are seperate. Alan Fall of Autumn 04:06, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
I agree, this is a book review, it makes no sense to have it on a Wiki, much less a Wiki devoted to zines. It should probably just be deleted. dan10things 11:49, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
Review vs entry
I meant it to be just info on the book - and the book is surely just as indie as Game Quest for ex. Perhaps I can rewrite it. PS Dan is against anything I do so I take everything he says as just the general no to all.