Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chapbook"
From ZineWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Q. HT list Chapbooks) |
Dan10things (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Editors - a question - should one issue Chapbooks be listed as zines?[[User:Musea|Musea]] 15:14, 13 September 2006 (EDT) | Editors - a question - should one issue Chapbooks be listed as zines?[[User:Musea|Musea]] 15:14, 13 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think if it's by a zine editor and more like a one-shot zine than a full book, then yes. But if it's by someone that doesn't publish zines or is really just a self-published book, then no. There is a "One-shot" tag with definition on the ZineWiki to add to one-shot zine listings ("A one-shot is a zine without multiple issues. One-shots are typically utilized when a zinester wishes to write material, or about a subject, not typical to their zine.") [[User:Dan10things|dan10things]] 17:31, 13 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:31, 13 September 2006
Editors - a question - should one issue Chapbooks be listed as zines?Musea 15:14, 13 September 2006 (EDT)
I think if it's by a zine editor and more like a one-shot zine than a full book, then yes. But if it's by someone that doesn't publish zines or is really just a self-published book, then no. There is a "One-shot" tag with definition on the ZineWiki to add to one-shot zine listings ("A one-shot is a zine without multiple issues. One-shots are typically utilized when a zinester wishes to write material, or about a subject, not typical to their zine.") dan10things 17:31, 13 September 2006 (EDT)
