Difference between revisions of "Talk:Witch kunt"
From ZineWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: There is just too much extensive rewriting that would need to be done in order to turn this into an actual article, so I've nominated it for deletion. If the editor of this zine would like...) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is just too much extensive rewriting that would need to be done in order to turn this into an actual article, so I've nominated it for deletion. If the editor of this zine would like Zine Wiki to keep this, please refer to the Main Page and the style manual before rewriting. [[User:InvisibleFriend|InvisibleFriend]] 07:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | There is just too much extensive rewriting that would need to be done in order to turn this into an actual article, so I've nominated it for deletion. If the editor of this zine would like Zine Wiki to keep this, please refer to the Main Page and the style manual before rewriting. [[User:InvisibleFriend|InvisibleFriend]] 07:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Agreed. This is an advertisement, not an encyclopedic article. [[User:Jerianne|Jerianne]] 01:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:33, 1 April 2010
There is just too much extensive rewriting that would need to be done in order to turn this into an actual article, so I've nominated it for deletion. If the editor of this zine would like Zine Wiki to keep this, please refer to the Main Page and the style manual before rewriting. InvisibleFriend 07:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. This is an advertisement, not an encyclopedic article. Jerianne 01:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)