Difference between revisions of "Talk:Witch kunt"

From ZineWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
There is just too much extensive rewriting that would need to be done in order to turn this into an actual article, so I've nominated it for deletion. If the editor of this zine would like Zine Wiki to keep this, please refer to the Main Page and the style manual before rewriting. [[User:InvisibleFriend|InvisibleFriend]] 07:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 
There is just too much extensive rewriting that would need to be done in order to turn this into an actual article, so I've nominated it for deletion. If the editor of this zine would like Zine Wiki to keep this, please refer to the Main Page and the style manual before rewriting. [[User:InvisibleFriend|InvisibleFriend]] 07:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
  
: Agreed. This is an advertisement, not an encyclopedic article. [[User:Jerianne|Jerianne]] 01:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
+
:Agreed. This is an advertisement, not an encyclopedic article. [[User:Jerianne|Jerianne]] 01:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
I will take another look at it and try editing out everything but the essentials instead of outright deleting it, so that at least we have a record of its existence. [[User:InvisibleFriend|InvisibleFriend]] 04:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:24, 31 March 2010

There is just too much extensive rewriting that would need to be done in order to turn this into an actual article, so I've nominated it for deletion. If the editor of this zine would like Zine Wiki to keep this, please refer to the Main Page and the style manual before rewriting. InvisibleFriend 07:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. This is an advertisement, not an encyclopedic article. Jerianne 01:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

I will take another look at it and try editing out everything but the essentials instead of outright deleting it, so that at least we have a record of its existence. InvisibleFriend 04:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)