Talk:Hollow Daze

From ZineWiki
Revision as of 01:14, 29 May 2007 by InvisibleFriend (talk | contribs) (Re-Categorizing Hollow Daze)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

It's my suggestion, which I've also mentioned in connection to the chapbook My Pencil Lead Broke, that rather than have articles on each chapbook an author has released, why not have an article on each author. In the case of both these books, it's claimed that the author is also a zinester. if this is the case, the articles on these authors can mention the zines they edited , or wrote for, as well as their books, and in doing so, maintain the relevance each article should have to Zine Wiki. InvisibleFriend 17:10, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

We've discussed chapbooks in the past and the feeling I believe was that the individual chapbooks could have articles, just as the individual zines do, so long as the author has contributed enough to the zine scene, by either making their own zine, or writing for others' zines. If author can't tie him/herself to a zine or two, then delete. Alan Fall of Autumn 19:01, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
I've taken the liberty of re-categorizing Hollow Daze as a zine. I noted that, as part of the review on the Musea website, the writer has included a quote from Throwrug #22, which refers to Hollow Daze as a zine; as well, the Musea site states that the reviews, of which Hollow Daze is one, are mainly of zines, some of which are reprinted from Zine World. Hopefully these references to Hollow Daze being a zine are enough to justify my re-categorization. InvisibleFriend 21:14, 28 May 2007 (EDT)